Some people believe that art, such as painting and music, does not improve people’s lives, so the government should not spend money on it. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Art is a fundamental part of society and should be funded as it enriches lives through charm and thought-provoking ideas.I personally disagree with

this

point and

this

essay will discuss the reasons and relevant examples to support my opinion.

To begin

with ,considering the point of view, because of the

arts

we are able to have the entertainment in our daily life and if there is no singing or painting we cannot explore the world sitting in one place even though we have good automation. To illustrate, if we have the technology of the internet, but we don't have a melody to listen to or movies to see and many other art-related entertainment purposes, the internet would become just like a study book, where you can just gain something but cannot be happy when you need something to refresh your mood.

In addition

, learning the

arts

in any form is known to stimulate the minds of the people.

As a result

, these people are able to perform better in the other areas of their life too. To exemplify

this

, a recent study by The American University of Neurosciences

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

has revealed that learning or practising a musical instrument significantly improves the memory of an individual.

This

proves that the benefits of the

arts

are innumerable for any person.

However

, governmental responsibility to invest in science and technology.

This

will ensure that they have better living standards.

In other words

, they must have the basic amenities to be able to enjoy the other experiences

such

as

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

the

arts

in life. In conclusion,some people think the

arts

should improvise our lifestyle.

Therefore

, the government must spend resources in

such

fields.