should countries invest in building transport systems? discuss both views and express an opinion

In the salad days of the millennium, there has been observed a drastic change in commuting. Nowadays, numerous ways have been discovered to travel.

However

Linking Words

, society is polarized into groups almost equally regarding the notion, of whether the transport networks should be funded or not. Different people have distinct mindsets. In the following paragraphs, I would shed light on both views before making a final note. To commence with the

first

Linking Words

perspective of the argument, there are a plethora of things to be shared in its favour.

First

Linking Words

and foremost, travelling plays a vital role in the life of the dwellers. Many folks have to move from one place to another on daily basis ,

for example

Linking Words

, go to the office and not everyone has their own conveyance.

Consequently

Linking Words

, an awful system must create hindrance in commuting, cause traffic congestion on roads and boost air pollution.

In addition

Linking Words

, the public network of transportation is one of the main sources of generating revenue for the country.

For example

Linking Words

, many nations prefer to promote a pool system and work on its improvement rather than using an individual medium in order to make money and save time.

Hence

Linking Words

, investing in public transport bestows numerous advantages. Shifting towards the

second

Linking Words

school of thought, too much financial support to the pool network not only declines the manufacturing of the vehicles but

also

Linking Words

reduces their imports. For an instance, if individuals start using public conveyance they will not purchase new vehicles and

hence

Linking Words

,

this

Linking Words

would impact the economic conditions of the nation.

Secondly

Linking Words

, we should not lose sight of the fact that

this

Linking Words

improvement in the scheme attracts more humans to use it and can cause many diseases and enhance the chance of spreading them among mortals. Let's take an example of a person, who has some contagious disease like Hepatitis-C and he travels in public transport.

As a result

Linking Words

, a large number of people are at a high risk of getting affected by him.

Therefore

Linking Words

, funding in the government commutation can have many negative repercussions too. In conclusion, after having discussed the arguments and the counter-arguments, I would like to infer my personal opinion that the pros of funding in transportation outweigh its cons because it not only impacts the lifestyle of the folks but

also

Linking Words

benefits the environmental conditions.