Some people feel that the government should regulate the level of violence in films on television and at the cinema. Others feel that violent films should not be regulated. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some say that the government has to organize and diminish the number of scenes that contain and involve

violence

in

films

both on TV and at the cinema, whereas others feel that regulating the movies is

such

a pointless and detrimental phenomenon while there are several ways to overcome the

violence

instead

. There are many reasons why many people open that the regulation of movies is a useless thing. The prominent reason is their feeling of obligation and coercion from the ministries to something they do not consider an important activity.

In addition

, they do suppose that

violence

occurs due to other reasons not including

films

.

This

condition might be because of the lack of awareness in the whole society, not to mention there are many countries that have lower rates of

violence

.

On the other hand

, some people think that cleaning the

films

of violation-related scenes is an absolutely critical method for becoming a safe community, due to their belief of how

violence

in movies is ruining the morals in society.

Furthermore

, in the previous years, lots of studies and research have been published about how vehemence is negatively affecting society,

however

, tons of people do not draw any attention to

such

a hazardous phenomenon. They do believe that

violence

contributes to big serious troubles

such

as aggression, lack of respect, and higher rates of crimes than before. To conclude, as far as I am concerned, I profoundly believe that

this

type of regulation is a necessity because it is evident that

such

initiatives are so effective to help decrease the amount of

violence

in the whole world.

Besides

, personally, I do mainly prefer to regulate the

films

and videos I watch every day from violent scenes, which could maintain my satisfaction with the movie.