Some people think that zoo are cruel and all zoos should closed.However, some people think zoo can help protect animals. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Nowadays, people have different points of view about either wildlife should live in the zoo or not. Despite the fact that it has adverse effects, there can be created a protective environment. On the one hand, when

animals

keep in a special atmosphere, they do not feel themselves in their natural

place

.

For example

. wild

animals

can come across a lot of other

animals

in the forest and either they can injure or win in a natural fight. While changing the seasons ,they get several experiences for staying survive. Even though getting their food in

this

specific environment is more challengeable but accustomed to

this

difficult situation.

Consequently

, according to some people, the inhabitants of natural environments have to stay in their surroundings due to getting their resilience.

Moreover

, whereas

animals

live in their own

place

it makes them happy.

On the other hand

, setting in the zoo, take away the

animals

from being trim. Because when they are in the nap of nature, they do many exercises but in a protective area they do not have

this

chance, so we could make them an opportunity to live on their land.

Furthermore

, living in the forest, mountains, and deserts is not exactly like an artificial

safety

Replace the word

safe

show examples

place

.

For instance

. even the Safari park appears to be the best

place

for wild

animals

but not the same. In conclusion,l believe that,

however

, living the

animals

in a protective zone is well designed but as the result, it is not their natural home. In my point of view , if the government has to pass a law forbidding several sorts of

animals

in nature and all humans obey

this

rule it would be a more protective way for them.