Some people believe that car-free days are effective ways to reduce air pollution. However, others argue that there are other ways that are more effective. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

While it is believed by some that the effective method to alleviate air

pollution

is through car-free days, others argue that there are ways that are way more effective than that. In

this

essay, I will discuss both arguments and express my opinion in the conclusion. On the one hand, it might appear to supporters of the former argument that car-free roads can reduce the high

levels

of air

pollution

, particularly in towns and city centres.

For example

, during the lockdown there were not many motor vehicles on roads, especially in metropolitan cities, which led to a significant reduction in the burning of fossil fuels, resulting in comparatively less

pollution

than before the lockdown.

Therefore

, they are of the opinion that

this

would be the only method to bring air

pollution

to a net zero level.

On the other hand

, advocates of the latter argument are in view that there are other

methods

such

as car-pooling, introducing electric vehicles, and opposing deforestation.

Firstly

, if governments encourage commuters to use car sharing,

then

it might significantly lower the

levels

of

pollution

.

Secondly

, electric vehicles

such

as electric cars, bikes, and buses are the modern

methods

of transport in developed countries, the main purpose of

this

contemporary approach is to lower emission

levels

.

Finally

, most developing and developed nations have been planting trees

instead

of cutting them down for the

last

5 years. As soon as started

this

they could find a tremendous increase in the

levels

of oxygen. In conclusion,

although

car-free days are one of the

methods

to reduce carbon emission

levels

, in my opinion, there other three effective

methods

which were explained in the latter paragraph can be far more effective