Some people believe that sport is an essential part of school life for children, while others feel it should be purely optional. Discuss these opposing views and give your own opinion.

It is believed that sport should be obligatory for youngsters, whilst there is another thought which opines that it has to be optional. From my perspective, the former views should be advocated.

Firstly

Linking Words

, a sedentary lifestyle while studying has to be interrupted by vigorous activities,

such

Linking Words

as physical education. Sports assists,

for instance

Linking Words

, to regulate blood circulation and bones' motion, which is crucial for the right development of children's physiology.

Moreover

Linking Words

, at younger ages kids appeal to entertainment and long hours of sitting might bring boredom and eliminate the focus aimed at learning. While exercising, they have an opportunity to cheer up and become awake, alive and energetic, which might be required for their

next

Linking Words

lessons.

However

Linking Words

, undoubtedly, not every child is able to attend those classes, because, they might have some issues, which resist physical activities,

such

Linking Words

as high blood pressure.

Nevertheless

Linking Words

, that does not mean that athletics should not be obliged. In every educational centre, it is allowed to bring and show medical documents, as a piece of evidence that one has restrictions, regarding health.

Otherwise

Linking Words

, laziness will distract students from attaining PE, even though they do not have any explanations. Eventually,

this

Linking Words

might lead to the problem of truancy, caused by slothfulness, which could be detrimental to every life aspect of students. In conclusion, it is clear that an active lifestyle plays a vital role in the lives of pupils, which should stay obliged at school, excepting some medical cases.

Thus

Linking Words

, the younger generation might neglect health importance.