Governments spend a large amount of money every year on works of art. ( for example, pain things & sculptures ) Do you think this is a good or bad use of public money ?

Nowadays,

governments

in some countries critically invest in

works

of

art

,

for instance

, painted canvases and sculptures. I partially think

this

is good to spend money in

this

way because the work of

art

is important to other

works

. Some famous people said that

art

inspires professors in other fields.

For example

, in Thailand, some builds

has

Change the verb form

have

show examples

the traditional style to attract people

that

is

Change the verb form

are

show examples

increasing income for their companies.

Governments

in some countries are able to increase GDP by using

works

of

art

.

For instance

, in Japan, mayors in some provinces tried to improve the elder place to attract travellers.

Thus

,

works

of

art

are able to inspire other

works

that have many advantages

such

as monetary advantages. Undeniably, the trait of several things is

art

. Blue collars can use

art

in their

works

.

For instance

, front-end developers can use colour theories for making consumers easily use a website.

However

, some things

is

Change the verb form

are

show examples

more important than

art

, including,

quality

and

safety

.

In other words

, workers ought to care about

quality

and

safety

more than

art

.

For example

, Sweden's travelling website is using colour theories to be easily used and it gives

quality

and

safety

as the

first

priority. In summary, not only

art

is a trait of many things, but

also

quality

and

safety

. To conclude,

governments

should invest in

works

of

art

intensively for monetary benefits and consumers.

However

,

governments

should be careful

to

Change preposition

about

show examples

other factors, including,

quality

and

safety

. People in their countries would be fine when

governments

have a good plan to spend money on something.