It is often argued
that
whether we should expend a plethora of money on aged house maintenance or simply remove them and construct brand-new ones. I completely disagree with the latter perspective. Correct word choice
apply
This
essay will Linking Words
further
discuss the pros and cons of both opinions, and why I stand for spending money on preserving ancient constructions.
On the one hand, historic sites should be protected, since they are precious for the cultural history of their cities as they give locals a sense of connection to the past. Linking Words
Also
, they can serve as tourist attractions bringing visitors from all over the world, and boosting the economy of that city. Linking Words
For example
, Eiffel Tower attracted more than 6 million visitors per year before the Covid-19 pandemic outburst, according to a survey on Statista. Linking Words
Moreover
, there are environmental considerations to maintaining aged houses. Any form of restoration of existing buildings is environmentally friendly compared to a new buildLinking Words
,
since there will be no need to create new materials, nor Remove the comma
apply
older
demolished materials Add a missing verb
have older
thrown
away.
Add the auxiliary verb
are thrown
Nevertheless
, there are a few shortcomings to preserving aged buildings rather than constructing new ones. Linking Words
Firstly
, if an earthquake happens, would it be safe Linking Words
to
the residents living in older houses? Nowadays, new housing blocks are subject to tougher regulations in the event of an earthquake. Change preposition
for
Secondly
, a city filled with aged buildings will look old-fashioned, and some folks might find it a gloomy place and concerned about public security, like the Bronx in New York.
In conclusion, though preserving old constructions can cost a lot and has its downsides, I believe preserving them can be beneficial to culture, economy, and environment.Linking Words
vicky3333