Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

A great number of politics advocate that the most crucial aim for them is economic advance whereas others believe that there are more aims as essential to states as economic improvements, I disagree with the latter statement since,to maintain different improvements

such

as education or productivity, the financial states of lands are the only way to do so.

First

and foremost, it is clear that, in our contemporary world, nations are measured by their education levels and productivity of them when compared. In detail, the education provided by the governments in schools and their number of well-educated citizens as worker population should be adequate for the country. On top of that, domestic production is massively important as well due to the fact that the countries do not need to import goods

such

as food or clothes from other nations

by

Change preposition

through

show examples

this

independent production.

However

, even if these assessment items are important for the countries, they cannot be sustained without financial subsidies which are catered by the governments.

That is

why the economic progress of nations is more important than others in order to keep maintaining

further

developments in their lands.

Furthermore

, the financial strengths of countries are concerning citizens since they are used for public services,

for instance

, public hospitals,public transport or child supports. To put it simply, even though some people advocate that other signs of progress should be considered with economic progress as identical, the authority thinks economical improvement is unique when it comes to

importance

Add an article

the importance

show examples

which I agree with since the others’ existence are dependent on the financial support of the governments.