Introduction
It is currently easy to find a zoo as there are many of them around the world.
However
, it is doubtful if they treat animals well or just want to make money out of it. As it is hard to be known, should a place be trusted to protect wildlife from danger or notLinking Words
.
Let's analyse both points and I'll give my point of view to conclude it.
Change the punctuation
?
Body · 1
On the one hand, it is possible to find sanctuaries which usually claim to have the duty of caring for injured pets and afterwards place them back in nature.
Although
, when some animal suffers an injury Linking Words
such
as being hit by a car Linking Words
for example
and does not completely recover from Linking Words
this
, it Linking Words
consequently
cannot survive if left in the jungle. Linking Words
Moreover
, take the risk of getting into another accident.
Linking Words
Body · 2
On the other hand
, there is a range of zoos with a business purpose only. Sadly, in Linking Words
this
case, animals are just a kind of attraction. Allegations of mistreatment, lack of hygiene and bad living conditions are unfortunately common in these venues. They pretend to treat creatures fairly when the public comes to visit, but that might be totally the opposite when no one is seeing Linking Words
this
.
Linking Words
Conclusion
To sum up, briefly, the pros and cons are easily found in keeping those places open. Even though knowing some of them just have the intention to help, there are still others taking advantage of it through bad treatment, and
that is
the reason why I truly believe the government should shut zoos down and take full responsibility for watching and caring for wildlife.Linking Words