Some people believe that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Green
issues
have become increasingly popular among some demographics of our society. Some
people
strongly believe that one of the most efficient ways of resolving
such
problems would be a significant rise in
fuel
prices
.
This
essay will discuss that
such
change could only be a partial resolution. The reasons supporting
this
opinion will be discussed below. To start with, a lot of
people
consider that if we put up the price of petrol and gas for automobiles, we would end up with a much lower number of vehicles on the streets.
This
in its turn would lead to cutting the number of exhaust fumes, which admittedly are one of the main reasons for causing environmental dilemmas.
Furthermore
, in case of high gasoline
prices
,
people
not only drive less but will generally travel smart, try to stay closer to home for shopping, combining various errands to be more efficient. And
this
potentially would reduce an average carbon footprint and contribute to conserving nature. Thua these few instances have bolstered an opinion that upsurge of an upsurge in
fuel
costs would help to tackle the green
issues
.
However
, regardless of the benefits above, the idea that environmental challenges could be eradicated only if
fuel
prices
are higher is not completely valid. The rationale behind it is that ecological concerns are caused not only by poisonous car emissions but
also
by a high number of other factors
such
as population expansion, pollution of land and water through excessive deforestation, industrialisation and overfilling landfills which emit CO2 and add to greenhouse gas emissions.
Therefore
, reducing emissions through increasing
prices
and discouraging
people
from driving less, will only be an interim solution to the problem.
Furthermore
, an upsurge in
fuel
prices
will affect transportation-focused industries like airlines and trucking, not only automobiles. Anything that must be shipped or transported—from apples to electronics—could cost more as gas
prices
rise.
This
is especially true for products, or components for products, that are manufactured overseas. Overall, the idea that increased
prices
on
fuel
would resolve the green
issues
could potentially lead to a far worse outcome for society. To conclude,
this
essay argued that increasing
prices
on
fuel
could be only a partial solution to environmental concerns and
people
who believe the opposite underestimate the real effects of what they believe. In my opinion, solving key
issues
is vital,
however
, we should not solely depend on one resolution and try to see more efficient and diverse ways of maintaining the environment clean.
Submitted by natalia.bagdavadze on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • environmental sustainability
  • renewable energy
  • fossil fuels
  • public transportation
  • carbon footprint
  • economic incentives
  • alternative energy vehicles
  • fuel-efficient
  • government subsidies
  • economic disparity
  • urban planning
  • rural infrastructure
  • sustainable development
  • carbon tax
  • green technology
  • demand elasticity
  • energy conservation
  • climate change mitigation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: