Scientists agree that people are damaging their health by eating too much junk food. Some people think that the answer to this problem is to educate people. Others think education will not work. Discuss both of them

Modern life has imposed substantial challenges for

people

in daily life. Exhausting and tedious working environments with ever-increasing duty hours have changed the way we live our day.

For example

, to cope with the high-pressure and tight daily schedule,

people

have less time to spend cooking and replaced healthy homemade dishes with fast

food

. In

this

essay, I'm going to clarify different opinions about the methods to decrease the amount of junk

food

eaten by

people

worldwide. One of the proposed methods by scientists is to educate

people

regarding the potential harm of fast foods.

For instance

, eye-catching billboards across the cities with illustrative figures, or repetitive and goal-oriented gamification for children are among the proposals.

Although

no one can bring fundamental critiques to these innovative ideas, they possess some latent consequences.

For example

, children are reluctant to profound learning materials, or as cities are bombarded with various distracting advertisements, the public may interfere with these educational billboards as another evil scheme of the greedy companies. But, if a government or NGO could manage to overcome these barriers, the educational method has extraordinary potential to lift public knowledge.

On the other hand

, some experts believe that only strict legislation on the

food

industry can alleviate

this

phenomenon. The rationale behind

this

way of thinking is that the

food

industry has a hard-to-beat network of advertisement and marketing, so educating society is not going anywhere and we need to address the problem at its origin. The aforementioned group suggest that putting the production lines under scrutiny and defining fines for disobeying laws are building blocks of

this

nationwide plan. While it seems a well-thought method, it is extremely difficult to implement. There are numerous companies and shops around the cities and structuring a functional system which able to operate 24/7 is daunting and costly. To sum up, we can see how these different methodologies are trying to diminish the concerns regarding the sharp increase in the fast

food

intake we have. Scientists aim to theorize state-of-the-art concepts to tackle

this

latecomer challenge. By taking the positive sides of each theory, and realizing the cooperation of the governments, the industry giants, and the advertisements gurus, we could pave the way to reach a crisply-designed and comprehensive method to lower the damage to the health of humans all around the world.