Some modern artists receive huge sums of money for the things they create , while others struggle to survive . Governments should take steps to resolve this unfair situation To what extent do you agree or disagree ? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge experience

The phenomenon of the

government

's way of spending on

artists

'

support

has aroused wide concern among various circles. Divergent as

people

's views on

this

issue in question may be, I totally agree with the idea that funding should only give the

artists

who have contributed to society. Of all the reasons why I agree with

this

idea, probably the most significant one is that the

government

's

support

money comes from the

country

's

people

. The

government

should spend

this

money on something that would benefit taxpayers and the

country

. Unnecessary expenditure will only cause

people

's rejection of the nation's policy.

For example

, in Hong Kong, you can always hear

people

point out how unreasonable the

government

's budget case is because there is a lot of unclear and useless spending on it. It is unhelpful to the current situation and the

people

who pay the bill. Another reason that should not be overlooked is that supporting some

artists

who had had success would bring advantages to the

country

.

For instance

, giving successful

artists

money

support

would allow them continually create new acts, and their works will attract tourists.

This

will in turn raise the economy. It

also

encourages other

artists

to keep their creative path. Since the

artists

thought that they might receive national

support

if they get famous. Under

this

line of thinking, only giving funding to famous

artists

is more beneficial than supporting all

artists

in the

country

.

Therefore

, it is clear that the idea of supporting part of modern

artists

is important to the

country

and the

people

.