Ownership of mobile phones has risen dramatically in recent years despite the potentially harmful effects they may have on our health and society. Governments should introduce measures to restrict ownership of mobile phones to those who need them for their work. To what extent fo you agree or disagree with this statement?
In
this
modern day and age, humans spend most, if not all their time around electronic devices, whether at work or at home. One of the electronic devices which we often keep in closest proximity to ourselves is none other than the mobile phone. However
, there has
been concerns over the significant rise in ownership of mobile Change the verb form
have
phones
lately which might have potentially harmful effects on the health
of humans as well as society as a whole. Hence
, should the government make the leap to restrict ownership of mobile phones
only to those who use
them for work?
First
and foremost, it is undeniable that by taking the step in restricting use
of mobile Add an article
the use
phones
, the government would also
be combating social media addiction, which has been strongly linked to the spike in cases of anxiety and depression in younger generations. This
carries many benefits, especially in enhancing health
by preventing eye-strain
, promoting exercise, as well as cultivating good mental Correct your spelling
eye strain
health
among people of all ages. One of the greatest boosts in mental health
are
provided by real-life social interactions Change the verb form
is
such
as simply chatting with a loved one or even getting back in touch with a long lost
friend. Socialising can significantly strengthen the bonds between people and create long-lasting and memorable relationships. Other than that, mobile phone restriction can serve as protection against online scams and malware which in reality has been the tragic downfall of many of its victims. It is Add a hyphen
long-lost
also
a distraction to drivers and has resulted in an increase in road accidents resulting from use
of mobile Correct article usage
the use
phones
when driving, which could have been easily prevented.
On the other hand
, mobile phones
are convenient as they provide faster communication and can be handy during emergencies. It may even be able to be the determining factor in a life or death
situation where every Add a hyphen
life-or-death
second
counts. Mobile phones
can save time, energy and transportation costs by reducing the need to travel for brief meet-ups with family or friends. Therefore
, it reduces carbon footprint and emission of green-house
gases with the usage of more online platforms Correct your spelling
greenhouse
such
as zoom and google meet.
In short, it is very clear that both arguments with or against restriction
of mobile Add an article
the restriction
phones
bring up different points that carry much importance each to a certain extent. But I personally believe that restricting ownership of mobile phones
to those who use
them for work only can considerably bring more benefits towards the people and society than otherwise
, despite the slight inconvenience.Submitted by soojulia6 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?