Some people believe more actions can be taken to prevent crime, while others think that little can be done. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

It is undeniable that

crime

is always a controversial topic among many people.

Although

some think that more measures can be considered to deter

crime

, others argue that few

actions

are sufficient.

This

essay will investigate both views, and the latter part will justify an opinion.   Some people believe that the

crime

rate can be reduced by adding more

actions

.

First

and foremost, the government could include a harsher punishment for offenders who commit violent crimes.

For instance

, other criminals are very aware of the punishment, and

therefore

they think twice before committing a serious

crime

.

Furthermore

, the number of rehabilitation centres should be raised, so that more and more offenders can join and learn not to commit a

crime

a

second

time.

Finally

, the authority can encourage more campaigns and counselling programs to raise awareness among criminals regarding the importance of life.  

However

, others argued that there is no need to include many policies as the existing system works well.

For example

, more money can be spent on new measurements, which in turn affect other sectors indirectly, like hospitals and education.

Therefore

, limiting certain

actions

can benefit the government as they can improve services in hospitals and education sectors.

The society

Correct article usage

Society

show examples

also

has the advantage of it.   I firmly agree that involving more

actions

could be far more advantageous to curtail the

crime

rate than limiting

actions

. Experts said that the more we invest to put off

crime

, the more we can reduce delinquency.   To conclude, adding

further

criminality handling

actions

to deter violence is paramount for society even though the government can utilize money in other sectors.