It is often said that government spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

With an ever-increasing

issue

concerning

government

expenditure, some people have opined that the

government

fiscal budget needs to be allocated to more important tasks rather than protecting

wildlife

.

This

essay will,

however

, present some reasons why I firmly disagree with the given opinion.

To begin

with, advocates of

this

idea argue that it would be better for

government

to spend

money

on more crucial and urgent problems in terms of social and economic.

For example

, given that the

increasing

Replace the word

increase

show examples

of crimes committed by youngsters from poor families is a severe

issue

for society, the

government

needs to spend more

money

on public services to correct

this

issue

.

In addition

, it is

also

necessary for the

government

to invest more fiscal budget on boosting and developing a nation’s economy as the competition among global countries tends to be getting severe. In spite of the reasons mentioned above, I strongly contend that

government

should spend a large amount of

money

on projects to preserve

wildlife

. Considering that the suffering of endangered wild animals is getting worse, there is not enough time for

this

issue

to be settled. It will be difficult or even impossible to recover the problems that occurred,

such

as extinction and collapse of the ecosystem.

Moreover

, extinction or decrease of

wildlife

will

also

finally

result in great loss for the country since keeping various species of

wildlife

will be a great power in global economies, in terms of food security and scientific advancement. In conclusion, it seems that it might be better for

government

to expend more

money

on solving social problems and projects for economic advancement.

Nevertheless

, I completely believe that spending a financial budget on projects to protect

wildlife

should be considered the most beneficial for the public in the long-term view.