Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defender’s past record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer.

There is a long-standing debate about whether all the previous history including the defender's past record should be shared with
jury
members under British and Australian laws or not. Some lawyers claimed that extra information would be an infringement on individual rights and I agree with
this
opinion. I will cover the reasons below to support my opinion.
Firstly
, a
jury
needs to be in a neutral position before the trial. If all the past records are accessible to
jury
members, some may get
prejudice
Wrong verb form
prejudiced
show examples
against the criminals, which leads to an unfair judgment.
For example
, a person who is being accused has a history of being in prison but it is not related to the case.
However
, that fact may influence the
jury
members’ perspective and change the final decision.
Therefore
, the information provided to a
jury
should be restricted by law, so that a
jury
can focus on
a
Correct article usage
the
show examples
case itself.
Secondly
,
while
the
criminal
Replace the word
crime
show examples
rate has increased, the recommitment rate
also
has increased. Some main reasons,
such
as poor job opportunities, a lack of emotional support and social stigma, make the ex-convicts turn to crime again after their release from
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
prison. It is tremendously hard for convicts to return to a normal life.
Thus
, the improvement of supporting systems
are
Change the verb form
is
show examples
required more than changing trial systems.
To conclude
,
although
all the information
of
Change preposition
about
show examples
criminals may allow a
jury
to have a determining factor for the final decision, I believe that unrelated facts should not affect the judgements to protect human rights.
Submitted by nanamach87 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: