Some people think local governments should spend money on art projects of major cities. Because these works of art (statues or painting) could make the landscape more attractive. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people today argued that the authority should expand
money
on art projects in big downtown more than in rural
areas
, which seems to be a matter of great public interest and
this
is in part a reflection of the rapid changes in our society.
However
, individuals want the rule to develop every country not just the large country has been the source of much-heated debate within society; some say that spending
money
on major centres is more important than the countryside,
while
others take the opposite view. Even though it may appear that opposing opinions can be maintained at the same time, they still have to be scrutinised.
To begin
with, regarding the benefits of the development of farmland , the greatest merit that needs to be remembered is that if the governments expend
money
on arts in rural
areas
will gain a lot of tourists to visit there.
In other words
, as seen recently, it encouraged the economy to help folk with it stimulates the economy. Based on the aforementioned statements, it is broadly maintained that explicating art in the countryside brings an advantageous aspect.
However
, there are voices that oppose strongly the idea, stating that the benefits of emerging big cities make the landscape more attractive brings is only one side of the issue, and if we investigate more,
it is clear that
often causes problems that should not be overlooked. One of them is that it often makes people find themselves in a situation where they will not get income from the tourists. In the worst case scenario, the small
areas
will not develop certainly is problematic and people should reconsider its value and role in their life. In conclusion, It is my view that
although
both views have reasons for support, it is still difficult for me to embrace the idea of the authority should expand
money
on art projects in big capital more than rural
areas
as flawlessly as there are definite problems that are not easily resolved.
Submitted by maysustudio on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: