Some people think that products should be made to last as long as possible, while others think making the products cheap is more important. Discuss both views and express your own opinion.

It is asserted that the durability of products is of great importance.
However
, cost-effectiveness is a key factor that appears to have a number of proponents. I advocate the former group. On the one hand, some advocate the idea of more
reasonably-priced
Correct your spelling
reasonably priced
show examples
products.
To begin
with, having a voracious appetite for
shopping
Verb problem
apply
show examples
affordable
goods
, people encourage a consumer-driven manufacturing process by which production lines would be expanded. Under
this
circumstance, more job opportunities could be made and the wheels of industry
will
Wrong verb form
would
show examples
be kept
Wrong verb form
keep
show examples
turning. An obvious example of
this
is China, known for its mass production. Not only has it recruited many locals, but
also
an array of jobs have been developed around the world.
Furthermore
, supporters of affordable
goods
claim that class disparity could be less apparent. Simply put, all walks of life would be able to accommodate their needs even the proletariat whose desires have been suppressed.
However
, the longevity of
goods
takes priority in other people’s opinion. The first compelling reason is that a culture of consumerism would no longer be promoted.
In other words
, when products
last
for a long time, people, irrespective of their purchasing power, try not to give in to the urge to go shopping.
This
is clearly delineated in a society where the trend-led approach to purchasing fashion clothing is rejected and replaced by slow fashion, focusing on conscious buying and thoughtful purchases.
Moreover
, there is a strong correlation between built-to-
last
items and their positive impacts on the environment. To put it another way, the more sustainable material is used, the less environmentally damaging waste,
such
as plastic, would be dumped, leading to securing the future of our planet.
To conclude
, I would tend to side with those supporting longevity when it comes to purchasing. It seems to be unreasonable to put the environment in jeopardy by generating more waste and seems more logical to prevent the mass discarding of
goods
and consumerist culture.
Submitted by mahsa19amiri on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
You have provided a complete response by addressing both views and expressing your own opinion. Well done!
coherence cohesion
Your essay demonstrates a clear and logical structure. Each paragraph has a clear main idea and the ideas are developed and supported with relevant examples. Great job!
lexical resource
Your use of vocabulary is impressive, with a good range of synonyms and phrases. However, try to vary your word choice even more by using more sophisticated words and phrases.
grammatical range
Your grammar is generally accurate, but there are a few minor errors. Pay attention to subject-verb agreement and avoid repetitive sentence structures.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • durability
  • sustainability
  • longevity
  • affordability
  • consumerism
  • waste
  • environmental impact
  • value for money
  • customer satisfaction
  • brand loyalty
  • consumption
  • economic growth
What to do next:
Look at other essays: