Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others think that the circumstances of a crime, and the reason for committing it should be considered when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both views.

The administration of justice in each country may have its laws.

Although

some

people

are advocates a fixed edict, others care about the circumstances of the

crime

. I will examine both views and express my opinion. Some

people

believe that if there is a fixed sentence for all

people

, it can make it possible to eliminate

crime

in society. In

such

a way that every person thinks about the result before committing a

crime

, which causes him to refrain from doing it.

Although

the existence of a definitive verdict regardless of the circumstances and words of the accused makes the court have a faster process, it may cause the judge to make a mistake and punish a person unjustly, which may not be refundable. Others believe that they should examine the conditions and situations of the criminal to know what was the motivation of the person to commit the

crime

. If the motivation of these

people

is identified and investigated by psychologists, it may be possible to prevent its repetition in the form of various trainings in society. which can ultimately reduce

crime

statistics scientifically and experimentally.

for instance

, If

someone

unintentionally causes

someone

's death in self-defence, he should not receive the same sentence as

someone

who murdered for no reason or out of spite. In my opinion, the law should be the same for all

people

, but justice generally does not mean that there is a penalty for all situations, because

someone

with mental disorders may not be able to understand the rules correctly and may not be able to follow logic.