Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment, such as course work and projects, is not a satisfactory way to do this. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

There is a view that formal examinations are the best method to use in order to appropriately evaluate students’ performances since continuous assessments,
such
as projects and coursework, are not effective enough. I partly agree with
this
statement because formal
exams
can often be better in terms of determining the appropriate score for a student but can
also
be too stressful which at times impacts the performance of a candidate.
Also
, some types of continuous
assessment
do teach specific skills. Mostly, formal
exams
,
such
as written tests, are the most suitable way to assess the student’s performance. During
such
tests, candidates are given similar conditions, and it is difficult to cheat because of the invigilator’s presence.
For instance
, IELTS
exams
are an effective method to demonstrate non-native speakers’ English level since tests take place in a specific venue under strict policies.
However
, it is
also
true that
such
exams
can be too stressful for certain candidates who find it difficult to perform well under pressure.
Nevertheless
,
such
exams
seem to be fair most of the time. Frequently, continuous
assessment
can be ineffective because
such
a style of academic
assessment
can be easy to cheat on or easier to prepare for. To be specific, coursework,
such
as a written assignment, can be submitted with the help of AI tools
such
as ChatGPT, which means universities are not evaluating the student but the software
instead
. As for preparation, course works and different projects often have a certain deadline
that is
easier to beat, which is why numerous students only start preparing a few days or even hours before the deadline.
However
, it must
also
be noted that a few methods of continual
assessment
may be beneficial for students’ development. One example is a presentation that may assist a candidate in terms of improving communication skills, which could be critical for prospective lawyers and businesspeople. In conclusion, I do agree that formal examinations can be more effective, but they are not always the best choice. The suggested examples show when alternative ways to assess students can be better.
Submitted by shaxzodeshniyozov002 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • controlled environment
  • academic ability
  • creativity
  • critical thinking
  • practical skills
  • holistic approach
  • high-stakes exam
  • rote learning
  • deeper understanding
  • plagiarism
  • standardized measure
  • consistency
  • fairness
  • track progress
  • feedback
  • equitable approach
What to do next:
Look at other essays: