In the last few decades there have been more and more cases of famous people being hounded by the press. Some people think that famous people in the media have no right privacy. To what extent do you agree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
More famous
celebrities
have been annoyed by the press because many fans are curious about their idols' lifestyles and daily lives.
Nevertheless
, some emerging stars want to polish their appearance through a few photos of their daily life taken by paparazzi. I absolutely disagree with violating
privacy
and believe it downgrades living
standards
.
Initially
, renowned influencers, whose actions and behaviours have a large influence on their fans, are often scrutinised.
While
it is important to hold
celebrities
accountable for their public actions, it does not justify invading their private lives.
For example
, publicizing a celebrity’s misbehaviour can lead to a community push towards better
standards
.
However
, some
celebrities
actually seek
this
attention to gain more public exposure and increase their fame, which can lead to lucrative advertising contracts and other career opportunities.
On the other hand
, from a legal perspective, monitoring public figures without their consent is against the principles of a democratic legal system.
Privacy
is a basic human right protected by legal frameworks, and its infringement can be considered a criminal act.
Moreover
, constant media scrutiny can cause significant distress and degrade the quality of life for public figures.
For instance
, many
celebrities
report feeling uncomfortable and harassed by paparazzi. Intrusive media practices can disrupt important personal events,
such
as dating or special anniversaries, adding unnecessary stress to their lives.
To conclude
,
while
there are arguments that media attention can raise moral
standards
, increase public interest, and enhance career success for
celebrities
, the invasion of
privacy
is fundamentally wrong. The legal implications and the negative impact on living
standards
outweigh the potential benefits, making it clear that famous people deserve their right to
privacy
.
Submitted by lenam2k1 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
The essay is quite comprehensive and offers clear ideas. However, it could benefit from a more in-depth exploration of the opposite viewpoint, even if you disagree with it, to show a more balanced argument.
coherence cohesion
Try to include more varied transitional phrases to enhance the flow of your ideas. While the logical structure is very strong, it could always be further refined with more sophisticated linking words.
task achievement
Consider giving specific examples to support your claims better, such as mentioning a specific instance where a celebrity was harassed by the paparazzi and the consequences they faced.
introduction conclusion present
The introduction clearly outlines the topic and your stance, making it easy for the reader to understand your position from the start.
introduction conclusion present
The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points and reinforces your position, providing a concise and clear ending to the essay.
supported main points
Each paragraph is well-developed and focused on a single main idea, which enhances the clarity and coherence of your argument.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • hounded
  • sensational news
  • unwarranted scrutiny
  • blurs the line
  • public interest
  • pervasive
  • public persona
  • complex relationship
  • invasive
  • ethical frameworks
  • privacy is upheld
What to do next:
Look at other essays: