Some believe that younger family members should be legally responsible for supporting older family members when they become physically, mentally and financially unable to look after themselves. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, taking care of elderly
members
of the family has contributed to a relevant problem in the world. Some people assert that the younger generation is accountable for legally providing mental, physical and financial help to older. Excluding some strong rationales, I maintain the same viewpoint on
this
concept, perceiving that
this
behaviour has been included in numerous cultures from one generation to another.
To begin
with, it is irrefutable that we owe our lives to our parents, because they almost have been dedicating their own lives to our offspring. It can be considered into account that humanity often has been helping needy ones, who are either unable or weak in any
groups
Fix the agreement mistake
group
show examples
of age.
For example
, in most countries, namely in Muslim regions it is a commitment and tradition to look after the elderly, which has been adhered
by
Change preposition
to by
show examples
ancestors to the new generation of youngsters.
Thus
,
this
is one of the compelling reasons why family
members
can be merged legally with cement bonds and continue
this
value to the next descendants.
In addition
, today the government has provided specific support for those who are unable to look after older
members
due to
hectic schedules and financial problems.
However
,
such
programs have not been successfully developed in the majority of countries, which aggravates the opportunity to take a carer, get a stable pension or visit medicine centres. To justify my opinion, in particularly undeveloped countries of Asia and Africa the state does not allocate special money for families which have issues regarding standards of living.
Therefore
, family
members
have to help and share love with each other in order to pay back to parents for looking after us when we were kids. In conclusion, there exist several strong reasons that underscore the significance of legal responsibility to take care of the elderly population. Even though it is true that the government should apply different social strategies to support them, I firmly believe that a fundamental legal obligation must be taken by their children first.
Subsequently
, individuals may be helped by the government in the absence of a caregiver or any other lack of finances.
Submitted by zhadyra.serikbayeva2016 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • filial piety
  • elder care
  • aging population
  • public resources
  • state welfare
  • financial burden
  • legal mandate
  • family dynamics
  • moral responsibility
  • residency
  • integrity
  • dependency
What to do next:
Look at other essays: