Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings, so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The issue of allocating funds for the maintenance and repair of old
buildings
versus constructing modern ones has sparked heated debates.
While
some argue that excessive money is spent on old
buildings
and propose demolishing them in favour of modern construction, I strongly disagree with
this
perspective. Preserving historical
buildings
holds immense cultural, historical, and environmental value, making it essential to invest in their conservation and restoration. Old
buildings
often hold significant cultural and historical value. They serve as tangible links to our past, representing the architectural heritage of our ancestors. Demolishing these structures would erase crucial aspects of our history and identity. Preserving historical
buildings
allows future generations to connect with their roots, fostering a sense of pride in their heritage. Take the Old Town in Jakarta as an example, the old
buildings
preserved attract tourists, contributing to the cultural and economic growth of the region. Knocking down old
buildings
in favour of modern ones is not an environmentally sustainable approach. The construction of new architecture generates a substantial amount of waste, consumes valuable resources, and contributes to pollution.
In contrast
, restoring and retrofitting old
buildings
often require fewer resources and can significantly reduce the
overall
carbon footprint.
Moreover
, adaptive reuse of historical property promotes sustainable development by repurposing existing structures for modern needs, reducing the need for new construction. In conclusion, demolishing old
buildings
in favour of modern ones is an untenable solution. Preserving historical architecture maintains cultural heritage, fosters a sense of identity, and contributes to sustainable development. Investing in the conservation of old
buildings
is an investment in our past and future, reflecting our commitment to cultural enrichment and environmental responsibility.
Submitted by saynah_ on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Your essay demonstrates a strong command of English and effectively addresses the given topic. You provide a thorough analysis of the issues, supporting your position with compelling arguments and relevant examples.
coherence and cohesion
Your essay has a clear and logical organization, with a well-structured introduction and conclusion. Your ideas are linked cohesively using appropriate transitional devices. However, consider using more varied transition words and phrases to enhance coherence.
lexical resource
Your use of vocabulary is impressive and demonstrates a wide range of lexical resources. Your word choice effectively conveys your ideas and arguments. Continue to strive for precision and sophistication in your use of vocabulary to further enhance your essay.
grammatical range
Your essay displays a high level of grammatical accuracy and a varied use of complex structures. Your sentences are well-constructed, and your use of punctuation is proficient. However, be mindful of maintaining consistency in verb tenses and sentence structures throughout the essay for even greater clarity.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Preservation
  • Restoration
  • Demolition
  • Architectural heritage
  • Cultural significance
  • Tourist attraction
  • Urban landscape
  • Sustainability
  • Conservation
  • Economic benefits
  • Historical landmarks
  • Urban renewal
  • Infrastructure
  • Maintenance costs
  • Modern amenities
  • Building regulations
  • Community identity
  • Heritage conservation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: