It is argued that animals that are not domestic or a source of
alimentation
are not useful and have to be left. I totally disagree with that statement. I believe that it is necessary to protect beasts, Check wording
food
first,
for natural and ecological reasons and Linking Words
then
Linking Words
also
for security reasons.
Linking Words
To begin
, we can not abandon them, because wild animals help to maintain the balance of ecosystems by controlling populations. Linking Words
For example
, birds like sparrows help pollinate flowers and disperse seeds. And predators like lions or wolves regulate the number of herbivores, protecting vegetation. If these species disappear, the natural balance would be destroyed, which would Linking Words
also
affect humans in the long term. Linking Words
Therefore
, even useless species actually contribute to the global health of our planet.
Linking Words
Secondly
, protecting beasts helps to maintain security in our countries. Indeed, leaving wild beings without control can have the consequence of multiplying predators' dangers. Linking Words
According to
an experiment conducted by the University of Montreal in 2021, consisting to leave in liberty ten different species of beasts in a forest. The consequences are revelatory because the rate of animal killing increases by 43% and , Linking Words
moreover
, the transmission of a new disease has been observed. So we must control and keep an eye on them.
Linking Words
To conclude
, I believe that it is absolutely wrong to leave wild animals, which is why I utterly disagree. And it is clearly not a waste of resources to protect them. In fact, it is the opposite; it is beneficial and it is necessary to ensure our protection and biodiversity.Linking Words