Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Nowadays, people travel a lot in their daily lives either to school, work or even overseas. Some believe governments should invest more money in
railways
instead
of
roads
.
However
, they should fund more on the
roads
. The
train
is one of the public transport that we have in many countries.
However
, it cannot reach every single place
due to
the limitation of the available
railways
.
For instance
, I can take a
train
to Buranda station which is 3km away from my house. It is the nearest
train
station to my home. After that, I must catch a bus to get back home.
Nonetheless
, I can actually get on the bus to go back home without a
train
.
Thus
,
roads
are more necessary than
railways
.
Besides
that, building the
railways
needs much more space and high cost and yet not everyone uses it.
On the other hand
, a lot of individuals have their own car or motorbike. It is really common for them to drive or ride to other places.
Hence
, it is essential to have good-conditioned
roads
that reduce the occurrence of accidents.
For example
, sometimes, we may notice holes on the road that need to be filled up
while
improvement is required for more road signs.
In addition
, trucks and lorries are used to transport goods between suburbs or states.
This
highlights the necessity of the funding from governments. In conclusion, it is evident that the funding of governments should increase on
roads
but not
railways
. The community can enjoy the benefit of
this
investment.
Submitted by khanhlinh892002 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Ensure that there is a clear thesis statement that sets out your position on the topic in the introduction. The essay does not present a clear thesis statement outlining the writer's viewpoint which can cause confusion about the writer's overall position. A clear argument in the introduction followed by logically structured paragraphs would improve task response.
coherence cohesion
Use a range of cohesive devices to link ideas across sentences and paragraphs. The essay should include more transition words or phrases to guide the reader and emphasize the relationship between ideas. The use of cohesive devices such as 'meanwhile,' 'therefore,' 'as a result,' and 'nonetheless' can make the argument more persuasive and the structure more coherent.
task achievement
Ensure each main point is developed with specific details and examples. This essay presents valid points but lacks the specificity and development required. Including more detailed examples and elaborating on the significance of each point would strengthen the argument.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Carbon emissions
  • Mass transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic growth
  • Regional development
  • Initial investment
  • Feasibility
  • Flexibility
  • Rural areas
  • Integration
  • Sustainable
  • Efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • Commuters
  • Public expenditure
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Long-term investment
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Modal shift
What to do next:
Look at other essays: