For the
last
50 years, the tremendous advancement in technology and supply chain has brought new possibilities in many areas, especially on the commercial side. Currently, Linking Words
for example
, supermarkets are capable of providing people with various items which are supplied from anywhere. Even with that convenience, there are still many critics who argue that supermarkets should not trade imported foods. I personally disagree with that argument and Linking Words
this
essay shall explain it.
Linking Words
First,
it is well known that every nation in the Linking Words
world
has its own advantages and limitations Use synonyms
due to
its location. Linking Words
For instance
, Switzerland does not have access to the sea or river, but the cocoa plant grows naturally there. If the stated argument is agreed by the Linking Words
world
, Use synonyms
then
the people in Switzerland would not be able to eat any great fish dishes. Linking Words
Additionally
, imagine a Linking Words
world
where we are not able to taste the top-tier chocolate or dairy products from Switzerland. Use synonyms
This
logic alone should strongly support my argument to decline the critics.
Linking Words
Second,
foods are considered the best weapon for spearheading the country's growth. By limiting the trade access of these essential commodities, it is predicted to impact the country more in a negative way in the economy. Linking Words
For example
, Brazil is the number one producer of coffee in the Linking Words
world
. After fulfilling the internal demand, without any capability to sell them to other nations, the coffee would go to waste Use synonyms
in addition
to making the price cheaper. Linking Words
This
, in the long run, would cause the farmer to lose.
To summarize, the limitation for supermarkets to only sell food produced within their own countries would bring many disadvantages for the people both in happiness and economic point. I believe that regulation should be rejected.Linking Words
gurunnevada