Some parents think that giving expensive gifts to children creating bad habits. do you agree or disagree

A lot of parents believe spoiling

pupils

with luxury

things

is the same as supporting bad behaviour to grow. I believe

that is

true because they don'

t

really need it and can promote

such

insensitive behaviour.

This

essay will discuss why I agree with

this

statement and provide examples to strengthen my arguments.

First,

a recent study shows that children who are surrounded by expensive goods will likely see it as something usual in the future. When they get older, they might think that those are just regular

things

that people have, which are not everyone as lucky as them.

This

mindset causes insensitive attitudes to grow.

For example

, they don'

t

think it is necessary to donate their unused -but still, in good condition- clothes because they are sure all people already have them. Insensitive practice can lead to a low social awareness level of

pupils

. As they expect everyone to be on the same level as them, they might not realize that some people can'

t

even eat three times a day.

This

situation is bringing a negative impact not only on the children but

also

on the society. On top of that, considering their age, it is questionable do they really need

such

things

. A bag worth more than $500,

for instance

, is not appropriately useful for the

pupils

. The amount of money spent on the bag can be allocated for something more crucial

such

as their education insurance, health insurance, or, conducting charity for

pupils

whose parents can'

t

even afford proper bags for them. The inequalities among

pupils

are sad to see, especially if the privileged one is not even being considerable. In conclusion, I strongly agree that we should stop normalizing giving expensive gifts to

pupils

. It is proven that it can promote the insensitive attitude that leads to a decreasing rate of social awareness and there is no urgency to buy

such

expensive

things

for them.