Some people think that testing on animals is necessary for discovering medicine that helps fight diseases, while others believe it is not necessary to test on animals for this reason. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Even though medical equipment and knowledge have evolved, numerous new diseases are discovered and need to be addressed. For
this
matter, an argument appears regarding the medicine testing on
animals
. Some people believe that testing is essential to check the effectiveness
while
the other group think it is unnecessary. I believe that both opinions have pros and cons, and I stand with the idea of testing medicine on non-human subjects.
To begin
with, sample testing of a new cure on
animals
is urgently needed before public use, and I agree.
Firstly
, doing research on
animals
is known to be less risky compared to doing it on humans. It is because medical researchers need to prevent any side effects caused by the medicine. To address
this
, they need to do a thorough assessment
whereas
implementing it on another human may be fatal to the subject. So, they need
animals
that resemble someone's body parts as subjects. Another reason is that it is cost-effective.
Subsequently
, the research usually tests the meds on
such
creatures which are known to be found easily,
such
as mice.
Thus
, they do not have to spend a high price. Albeit beneficial, animal testing is opposed by some groups of people,
for instance
, animal lovers and vegans. The main reason for
this
argument is based on moral values because these communities believe that
animals
are
also
living creatures who have the right to live and applying the test to them is hurting them. As an alternative, they suggest government provide a volunteering system for better medical testing. It means that the public who are willing to be tested can apply as a research subject. In
this
way, the medical team can find a more suitable reaction to the medication. In conclusion, the opinion to test new meds on
animals
is needed for humanities. I agree with
this
idea because it is less risky and cheaper. Despite those reasons, some people believe that
such
testing is against their morale.
Submitted by serlyayus on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Coherence & Cohesion
Ensure a clear and consistent structure throughout the essay to enhance readability and flow. Utilize a variety of transitional phrases to effectively link ideas and paragraphs.
Task Response
A more balanced discussion of both views would enhance the overall balance and depth of the essay. Aim to discuss each viewpoint with equal depth and consideration.
Language
Incorporate more varied and precise vocabulary to express ideas more effectively. Avoid repetition of words and phrases. Aim to use synonyms and a range of vocabulary suited to academic writing.
Task Achievement
To better support your arguments, include more detailed and specific examples. This will strengthen your claims and make your essay more persuasive and informative.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Ethical dilemmas
  • Medical breakthroughs
  • In vitro (test tube) experiments
  • Alternatives to animal testing
  • Clinical trials
  • Vivisection
  • Biomedical research
  • Animal welfare/rights
  • Cross-species extrapolation
  • Compassionate use
  • Cruelty-free practices
  • Suffering alleviation
  • Genetic engineering
  • Speciesism
  • Human-animal physiological differences
What to do next:
Look at other essays: