Some people think that testing on animals is necessary for discovering medicine that helps fight diseases, while others believe it is not necessary to test on animals for this reason. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Even though medical equipment and knowledge have evolved, numerous new diseases are discovered and need to be addressed. For

this

matter, an argument appears regarding the medicine testing on

animals

. Some people believe that testing is essential to check the effectiveness

while

the other group think it is unnecessary. I believe that both opinions have pros and cons, and I stand with the idea of testing medicine on non-human subjects.

To begin

with, sample testing of a new cure on

animals

is urgently needed before public use, and I agree.

Firstly

, doing research on

animals

is known to be less risky compared to doing it on humans. It is because medical researchers need to prevent any side effects caused by the medicine. To address

this

, they need to do a thorough assessment

whereas

implementing it on another human may be fatal to the subject. So, they need

animals

that resemble someone's body parts as subjects. Another reason is that it is cost-effective.

Subsequently

, the research usually tests the meds on

such

creatures which are known to be found easily,

such

as mice.

Thus

, they do not have to spend a high price. Albeit beneficial, animal testing is opposed by some groups of people,

for instance

, animal lovers and vegans. The main reason for

this

argument is based on moral values because these communities believe that

animals

are

also

living creatures who have the right to live and applying the test to them is hurting them. As an alternative, they suggest government provide a volunteering system for better medical testing. It means that the public who are willing to be tested can apply as a research subject. In

this

way, the medical team can find a more suitable reaction to the medication. In conclusion, the opinion to test new meds on

animals

is needed for humanities. I agree with

this

idea because it is less risky and cheaper. Despite those reasons, some people believe that

such

testing is against their morale.