some people say that Government should break down all the historic building and replace them with modern buildings. Do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
City construction consists of modern and historic
buildings
. In fact, I strongly disagree with those who argue that the
Government
should destroy all the
buildings
that have historical value and replace them with modern ones for two reasons.
Firstly
, breaking down the historic building has no urgency at all.
For example
, why does the UK
government
have to demolish The Old College belonging to The University of Edinburgh if they are still well constructed
.
Change the punctuation
?
show examples
Although
it seems old, the building has been used for many academic activities which means if the
government
choose to replace it with modern construction, it will disturb students' learning processes. Rather than destroy, I think it is better for the
government
to do regular maintenance to all the historic
buildings
.
Secondly
, historic
buildings
are invaluable assets for a country. To illustrate
this
, let us talk about Buckingham Palace which has been one of the icons of The UK. Not only embody a nation's history, culture, and society, but the building
also
provides a tangible connection to the past so that we can learn about how people lived back
then
.
Furthermore
, the
government
can maximize the utility of the historic
buildings
to become a tourist spot. In a small city in Indonesia, Solo, there is a palace named Mangkunegaran which already stood for a long time period. Even though today the
government
system has been changed, the
government
of Solo see
this
as an opportunity to attract both local and foreign tourists to learn about the history of Mangkunegaran. In fact, all the
buildings
have their own character which can attract overseas visitors since nowadays photography in aesthetical places has become an increasing trend. In conclusion, it is not an urgent thing to transform historic into modern
buildings
, and keeping all of it actually brings benefits for a country which is a rising nation's revenue
due to
tourism activity. I,
therefore
, remain firmly convinced that destroying all the historic
buildings
is really a bad decision.
Submitted by mmmuuu on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task Achievement
Provide a clear thesis statement in the introduction that directly addresses the prompt. This will ensure the examiner immediately understands your position.
Coherence and Cohesion
Use a wider range of linking words and phrases to improve the flow of your essay and better connect ideas between sentences and paragraphs. Examples include 'Moreover,' 'Consequently,' and 'In addition to'.
Task Achievement
Consider addressing potential counterarguments to strengthen your argument. This can showcase a broader understanding of the topic and further improve Task Achievement.
General Advice
Double-check for minor grammatical errors and ensure consistent use of tenses throughout your essay to enhance readability.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • invaluable assets
  • tangible connection
  • architectural heritage
  • modernization
  • energy efficiency
  • adaptive reuse
  • historical significance
  • economic implications
  • sustainable
  • green technologies
What to do next:
Look at other essays: