Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
University
education
is one of the crucial factors to improve the development of a country, thus
some people think that the government
has to set it free for all students
from all backgrounds. In my opinion, I partly agree with the ideas that education
have to be accessible for all, but the government
should consider the financial background that students
have.
On the one hand, free education
without seeing students
' financial ability is an unfair treatment. This
is because the rich and the poor have to compete in the same selection process to get free access to university while
they have not in the same level since the beginning. The rich can have a bigger chance to pass the system
since they can access all portals to maximize their ability. I mean by this
, for instance
, if the government-run
Correct your spelling
government
this
system
, those who are rich can join a course that teaches them how to pass the selection system
. Not only that, but they also
have more ability to complete administration documents such
as English proficiency whereas
the poor can not afford it.
On the other hand
, the government
should really think about regulating education
that is
free for students
having low economic status. Firstly
, the free education
system
will really help the poor to access the same education
as the rich so there will be no gap in mindset and knowledge. In fact, due to
lack of money, parents possibly send their children to study in a low-quality school or even do not obligate their kids to go to school and encourage them to work as soon as possible. Furthermore
, with the system
that makes it possible for a student to pursue their undergraduate program, the government
can earn benefits from it. In society, we often see that there are numerous smart people who can not afford their education
but they have a big potential to grow. If the government
can take this
as an opportunity, later on, they can use students
' skills and abilities to accelerate the nation's development.
In conclusion, the rich who are actually capable of paying university tuition fees have to be excluded from the free education
system
. I, therefore
, really support this
idea in order to create an equal education
quality for all students
.Submitted by mmmuuu on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Task Achievement
To enhance task achievement, focus on deeply analysing the prompt by offering a more nuanced perspective on why free education for all can be both beneficial and problematic, essentially strengthening your argument with denser evidence or a wider range of examples.
Coherence
Improve your coherence by ensuring smoother transitions between paragraphs. Using phrases like 'Furthermore,' 'Additionally,' 'On the other hand,' can create a more fluid reading experience. This also helps signal to the reader that a new point is about to be introduced or an existing point is about to be expanded upon.
Cohesion
In terms of cohesion, make sure your essay maintains a consistent focus on the essay question throughout. Introduction and conclusion should clearly state your overall position, and each paragraph should relate directly back to the topic. Incorporate varied but accurate linking words and aim for each paragraph to logically follow from the one before it.