Many people argue that free public transportation should be available in most major cities. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this idea?
Transportation
is a cornerstone of major cities
, enabling residents to transport from one point to another. The debate over whether cities
should make public transportation
free of charge in metropolises has been longstanding,with a majority of people praising the benefits that it will bring to the cities
. It is my contention that while
benefits such
as less traffic and improved air quality will be fulfilled afterwards, I would say the drawbacks are solely limited to the accumulation of crowding in alternative transportation
vehicles
due to
the growth.
Making city transportation
costless indeed has several advantages, and one of the most noticeable ones is alleviating congestion in capital cities
. Many key cities
around the world are facing the challenge of dealing with a large number of private vehicles
on the roads, leading to long congestion lines. By providing free transportation
, with support from government agencies, citizens are more likely to choose public vehicles
for their travel needs. A great example of this
is Luxembourg, which became the first country to make public transportation
free. As a result
, people started to prefer using public transportation
instead
of relying on their cars. Furthermore
, presently, the environmental impact of exhaust gasses has reached an alarming rate in many major cities
such
as Shangai, New York and Istanbul where the conditions of public transportation
are not an ideal fit. A second advantage emerges here as the number of private vehicles
will be substantially decreased if the governors have decided to refuse to charge its citizens for communal transportation
.
On the contrary
side, free transportation
may also
lead to a condition in which the existing city transportation
premises could not handle this
instantaneous demand growth, leading towards crowd gatherings on metro and buses. Thus
, it is important to acknowledge that in order to establish sustainable transportation
within the cities
, the current capacity of transportation
facilities should be analyzed and expanded to evade the unanticipated swarm of citizens prior to making free-of-charge transportation
publicly available.
In conclusion, free public transportation
in major cities
has both merits and demerits. While
it can alleviate traffic congestion and improve air quality, it also
poses a threat to cause overcrowding issues.Submitted by orkhanshamil on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Examples
Try to provide more specific examples to support your arguments. While you mentioned Luxembourg as a successful case of free public transportation, adding demographic or statistical data could enhance the persuasiveness of your argument.
Sentence Structure
Consider diversifying your sentence structures to add variety and interest to your writing. This can also help in making your essay more engaging and dynamic.
Balance and Neutrality
Be mindful of maintaining neutrality, especially when presenting the disadvantages to ensure a balanced discussion. While you highlighted the potential for overcrowding, further elaboration on how this concretely impacts the public transportation system could provide a fuller picture.
Logical Structure
You have a clear logical structure that effectively outlines the advantages and disadvantages of free public transportation, which aids in understanding your argument.
Introduction and Conclusion
The introduction and conclusion are well-presented, concisely summarizing the main points and effectively framing your argument.
Task Response
Your essay demonstrates a complete response to the task, addressing both the advantages and disadvantages of the topic with relevant examples where possible.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.