Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. Do you agree or disagree?
In the realm of education, the appraisal of admission performance remains a topic of ongoing debate.
While
formal cross-examinations have long been considered the gold standard, I disagree with the notion that they are the only effective means of evaluating recruitment. Continual judgment methods
, such
as coursework and projects, offer valuable insights into recruitment capabilities and should not be disregarded.
Formal observation certainly have
Change the verb form
has
their
merits. They provide a standardized way to measure Correct pronoun usage
its
students
' awareness and skills
within a specific timeframe, allowing for direct peer comparisons. Additionally
, checking can assess admission's ability to recall information and apply it under pressure, skills
that are undoubtedly important in certain contexts.
However
, formal audits have limitations. They place undue emphasis on memorization and rote learning, often neglecting critical thinking, creativity, and practical application of knowledge. Moreover
, they can induce stress and anxiety in recruitment, leading to performance-related issues that may not accurately reflect their true abilities.
On the other hand
, continual assessment
methods
offer a more holistic approach to evaluating students
' performance. Coursework allows students
to demonstrate their understanding of concepts over an extended period, encouraging deeper engagement with the material and fostering independent learning. Projects provide opportunities for admission to apply their philosophy in real-world contexts, fostering creativity, problem-solving skills
, and collaboration.
Furthermore
, continual estimate methods
provide valuable feedback to both students
and teachers throughout the learning process, enabling timely interventions and adjustments to teaching strategies. This
ongoing feedback loop promotes student growth and development, leading to better learning outcomes.
Critics may argue that continual judgment practices are subjective and prone to bias. While
it's true that estimate criteria must be well-defined and consistently applied, this
challenge is not unique to continual assessment
. A formal diagnosis can also
be influenced by question-wording
, exam conditions, and grading practices.
In conclusion, Correct your spelling
question wording
while
formal inquiry has its place in education, it should not be the sole determinant of students
' performance. Continual assessment
methods
offer a more comprehensive and equitable approach to evaluating students
' knowledge, skills
, and abilities. By embracing a variety of assessment
techniques, educators can better support student learning and foster a more inclusive and dynamic educational environmentSubmitted by buyabuya201 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
To improve your 'task achievement' score, ensure that your argument is supported by more detailed and specific examples that clearly illustrate your points. This will provide a stronger backbone to your thoughts and present a more convincing argument.
coherence cohesion
Consider diversifying your transition phrases to enhance the flow of ideas and improve the overall coherence of your essay. While your essay is logically structured, more varied transitions can make the argument more compelling and easier to follow.
introduction conclusion present
Your introduction and conclusion were clear, effectively framing your argument and summarizing your views, thereby earning a high score in that aspect.
logical structure
Your essay demonstrated a logical structure, making it easier for the reader to follow your line of argumentation.
complete response
You have thoroughly responded to the task at hand with comprehensive ideas and a clear standpoint throughout the essay.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.