Some people say in order to prevent illness and disease, governments should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the modern age, standards for a healthy life are something which bears some consideration.

This

writer contends that local governments have to establish policies to limit the problem of environment and living conditions for residents. It must be recognized that environmental problems to excess result significantly in the lifestyles of people. Extensive research has consistently shown that environmental pollution is the leading cause of various serious diseases, including lung cancer, heart disease and respiratory illness. By implementing suitable policies, governments can prevent disease problems and protect inhabitants from exposure to harmful pollutants.

Thus

, it is necessary to reduce the incidence of diseases and improve public health outcomes. Another point to consider is that life conditions

also

have considerable effects on

well-being

Add an article

the well-being

show examples

of inhabitants. To be more particular, people who live in slums are likely to have higher risks of suffering from illness. Take the UK as an example here, where loads of homeless live under the bridges or dumps surrounding the luxury city, with more than 50000 hospital admissions attributable to bacteria and 70000 deaths in the UK.

Therefore

, if local authorities are more responsible and care for individual health, they can alleviate the strain on public healthcare expenditure, reducing the need for costly treatments and improving

overall

healthcare affordability for all citizens. In conclusion, there are loads of problems that have a significant effect on healthy lifestyle. Given the fitness risks associated with

this

trend, I believe that authorities will give suitable policies for the warranted life of residents.