Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a common belief that investing in
motorways
and
roads
instead
of public means of
transport
is essential. From
this
author's perspective, it is apprehensive to not take public
transport
seriously
due to
environmental and residential perks.
Firstly
, using public
transport
systems can contribute to protecting the environment. Obviously, some personal vehicles
such
as motorbikes or cars often exhaust a large number of detrimental substances like CO2 or SO2, so it is suitable to use other means of
transport
that are more environmentally friendly and practical in maintaining human habitat.
Furthermore
, using personal transportation in
motorways
is not ideal for saving fossil fuel and energy because they have the same use of energy compared to public transportation but the capacity is significantly lower than its counterparts, compared 1 to 7
people
in a car to over a hundred
people
in trams or trains. Thú, investing in
roads
and
motorways
í not an appropriate action. In terms of residential benefits, spending money on
motorways
and
roads
is an obvious waste. To explain, the expectation of improving
motorways
and
roads
can originate from a traffic jam in peak hours, so spending money on them may be a valid point.
However
, when governments improve public
roads
,
people
tend to use their personal vehicles more and more, which results in the destruction of the environment and economy.
Besides
that, the authority can consider enhancing public
transport
systems because of the larger capacity of
people
and effectively saving energy and money.
Hence
, sparing budgets in public transportation is more suitable than that of
roads
and
motorways
. In conclusion, investing in
roads
and
motorways
is not as effective as that
of
Change preposition
in
show examples
public
transport
systems
due to
the superior characteristics of saving resources and protecting the environment
..
Replace the punctuation
.
...
show examples
Submitted by [email protected] on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

language
Ensure consistent use of vocabulary and avoid minor spelling errors to enhance clarity. For example, 'thú' should be 'thus.'
task achievement
Further elaborate on the point about the negative economic impact of investing in roads over public transport. This would strengthen your argument by giving a more comprehensive view.
coherence cohesion
Your essay has a clear and logical structure, making it easy for the reader to follow your argument.
coherence cohesion
You have included an introduction and a conclusion, both of which are well-connected to the main body of your essay.
task achievement
Your ideas are generally clear and well-organized, with appropriate examples to support your main points.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Infrastructure
  • Transportation
  • Congestion
  • Economy
  • Carbon emissions
  • Pollution
  • Social inclusion
  • Urban development
  • Efficient
  • Investment
  • Reliance
  • Boosting
  • Affordable
  • Private vehicle users
  • Public transport system
What to do next:
Look at other essays: