Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems such as railways and trams. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
There is a common belief that investing in
motorways
and roads
instead
of public means of transportation
is essential. From this
author's perspective, it is apprehensive to not take public transport seriously due to
environmental and residential perks.
Firstly
, using public transport systems can contribute to protecting the environment. Obviously, some personal vehicles such
as motorbikes or cars often exhaust a large number of detrimental substances like CO2 or SO2, so it is suitable to use other means of transportation
that are more environmentally friendly and practical in maintaining human habitat. Furthermore
, using personal transportation
in motorways
is not ideal for saving fossil fuel and energy because they have the same use of energy compared to public transportation
but the capacity is significantly lower than its counterparts, compared 1 to 7 people
in a car to over a hundred people
in trams or trains. Thú, investing in roads
and motorways
í not an appropriate action.
In terms of residential benefits, spending money on motorways
and roads
is an obvious waste. To explain, the expectation of improving motorways
and roads
can originate from a traffic jam in peak hours, so spending money on them may be a valid point. However
, when governments improve public roads
, people
tend to use their personal vehicles more and more, which results in the destruction of the environment and economy. Besides
that, the authority can consider enhancing public transport systems because of the larger capacity of people
and effectively saving energy and money. Hence
, sparing budgets in public transportation
is more suitable than that of roads
and motorways
.
In conclusion, investing in roads
and motorways
is not as effective as that
in public Correct pronoun usage
apply
transportation
systems due to
the superior characteristics of saving resources and protecting the environment.Submitted by [email protected]
on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
relevant specific examples
Try to provide more specific examples to support your points. For example, mention specific cities or countries that have benefited from public transport systems to strengthen your arguments.
clear comprehensive ideas
Ensure that your main points are fully developed. Some ideas, such as the environmental benefits and the energy efficiency of public transportation, could be expanded further to provide a more comprehensive argument.
introduction conclusion present
The essay has a clear introduction and a strong conclusion, summarizing the main points effectively.
logical structure
The logical structure of the essay is good, with paragraphs that flow well from one to the next.
complete response
The essay provides a complete response to the prompt, addressing the importance of public transportation and its benefits over roads and motorways.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?