Some people believe that individuals can do little to improve the environment, while others think that individuals have a significant role in protecting the environment. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some argue that environmental action is pointless if it is done by a single person,

while

others perceive that

however

small, a person's help in keeping our habitat more livable matter.

To begin

with, some assert that an action

that is

driven by an individual might seen as a little to less impact. Both helping the environment and distracting it, there will be no massive effect on the earth.

For instance

, a man irresponsibly throws trash into a river. The trash itself may be small,

however

, keeping

this

mindset any longer will lead to a bad habit, and have a serious effect on environmental stability.

Furthermore

, if all of the individuals in the world think that way, it is nonsense if there is no negative outcome.

In contrast

, others are convinced that each person has a pivotal impact on the human habitat. A positive movement towards sustainability of the environment, which in the first place is initiated by an individual,

then

collectively done by other individuals, will later bring huge outcomes.

For example

, a no-plastic movement is promoted by somebody. Other people might see that as an impressive yet simple idea to help the environment, and

then

they replicate the movement.

Finally

, it comes into a lifestyle and generates positive outcomes for Mother Earth. I personally stand with the second view. Every big evolution starts from a small one, and in

this

case, we as a sole human. Environmental concerns should be practised hand-in-hand by all parties, from an individual, a family,

a

Correct word choice

or a

show examples

group of friends, to companies and governmental institutions.