All companies should provide sports and social facilities to the local community. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Opinions are divided on whether the provision of
sports
and social facilities
to the local community
should be an obligation for all companies
. Although
I may acknowledge the benefits of this
suggestion, I still firmly think that this
should not be mandatory for all.
Those who are in favour of companies
providing sports
and social facilities
may have several cogent arguments. They may well argue that by doing so, companies
can enhance their public image. For instance
, Google, Apple, and other technology giants have been known to invest in local community
projects, which has boosted their reputation as organizations that fulfil their corporate social responsibility. Furthermore
, providing sports
and social facilities
can have a direct positive impact on employees of the company.As a result
, access to these amenities can improve employee well-being, reduce stress, and increase overall
job satisfaction, which can make them more likely to be productive and engaged in their work and in turn ultimately benefit the company.
Nevertheless
, I am firmly against the notion that all companies
should be responsible for providing these facilities
. One primary concern is that not all companies
have the financial capability to undertake such
initiatives.The reason for this
is that small and medium-sized enterprises, in particular
, may struggle to allocate funds for community
projects without compromising their core business operations. Another reason is that the responsibility of providing sports
and social facilities
traditionally should mainly fall within the realm of government and public institutions as these entities are better positioned to assess community
needs and allocate resources accordingly
. While
corporate involvement is beneficial, it should complement, rather than replace, public efforts.
In conclusion, while
it is beneficial for companies
to provide sports
and social facilities
to the local community
, this
should not be an obligation for all companies
. Therefore
, large corporations with the necessary resources can and should contribute to community
development as part of their corporate social responsibility initiatives; however
, smaller businesses should not be compelled to undertake such
projects if it jeopardizes their financial stability.Submitted by [email protected] on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
The essay effectively responds to the task by addressing both views and providing a clear stance. However, you could further elaborate on reasons and provide more specific examples to strengthen your argument. For instance, mentioning how small enterprises might currently struggle financially even without additional obligations would add depth to your point.
coherence and cohesion
Your essay is generally well-organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. Ensure that each paragraph transitions smoothly to the next. Phrases like 'On the other hand,' 'In contrast,' and 'Additionally' can enhance flow between points.
task achievement
While your main points are well-supported, providing more specific examples and evidence would further bolster your arguments. For instance, reference specific studies or statistics about the financial burden on small businesses or the effectiveness of community efforts led by large corporations.
task achievement
You present clear and comprehensive ideas, making your stance easy to understand.
coherence and cohesion
Your essay has a logical structure with well-developed paragraphs, contributing to its clarity.