Subsidising Fruits and Vegetables vs. Taxing Unhealthy Foods

There is an ongoing debate about whether the government should subsidize fruits and vegetables, known for their health benefits, or impose taxes on unhealthy

foods

. In my opinion, a dual approach of subsidizing nutritious

foods

and taxing junk

foods

is necessary, as a single solution would not suffice in addressing the

obesity

epidemic. In recent years, there has been a dramatic increase in physical health issues

such

as diabetes, hypertension, and cardiac complications.

This

surge has been primarily attributed to unhealthy dietary habits, resulting in over 30% of the world's population being either overweight or obese,

according to

the World Health Organization (WHO). Fruits and vegetables are rich in micronutrients and essential minerals, which are crucial for adequate physiological functioning and longevity. Multiple studies have proven that incorporating plant-based

foods

into daily diets increases longevity by restoring cholesterol levels, providing antioxidants, maintaining sugar levels, and helping to clear toxins from the body.

For example

, my grandfather, who regularly consumes seasonal fruits and vegetables, has lived a healthy life into his 90s, unlike his counterparts who succumbed to the adverse effects of an oily and meat-based diet.

However

, the cost of healthy

foods

can be a significant issue for the poor, leading to malnutrition and hindering their potential. Government subsidies could help these sections of society, ensuring equal opportunities for all to lead fulfilling lives.

Conversely

, imposing additional taxes on unhealthy

foods

,

such

as fried potatoes, pizza, burgers, and other fast

foods

, may help curb the

obesity

epidemic. The affordability of these

foods

means that even economically disadvantaged individuals can consume them, contributing to

obesity

rates across all socioeconomic strata. WHO data shows that

obesity

is as prevalent among the poor as it is among the affluent.

Hence

, taxing junk

foods

could potentially reduce their consumption.

However

,

this

approach is more complex than it appears. A significant

behavioral

Change the spelling

behavioural

show examples

change is required, where individuals adopt a healthier lifestyle that includes regular physical exercise, avoiding smoking and drinking, and maintaining good psychological well-being. These changes, combined with dietary improvements, are essential for longevity and an enriching life. Conclusion: In summary, subsidizing healthy

foods

along with

taxing fast

foods

may help reduce the burden of diseases related to

obesity

.

However

,

this

approach alone is not sufficient. People must adopt healthier lifestyles and focus on their well-being to achieve the

behavioral

Change the spelling

behavioural

show examples

changes necessary to tackle an epidemic of

this

proportion.