A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is widely argued that individuals should provide
animals
the same rights as humans and should not be deprived of their habitats. While
others believe that the satisfaction of people's needs, such
as food and the analysis of research
, are more significant by consuming animals
. In my view, I believe that the latter view is more beneficial as these amenities are beneficial for human needs.
To begin
with, proponents believe that animal habitats should not be deteriorated for the sake of human satisfaction. This
is because as the population surges rapidly and land is more occupied by families for their own benefit, they therefore
have limited space to live in their own habitats rather than migrating to a new place. For instance
, if the deforestation process continues to enhance at a rapid pace, then
animals
living at
that particular place will be affected extremely at the hands of humans. Change preposition
in
Hence
, certain rules and regulations should be mandatory for people to follow so that living species can live peacefully.
On the other hand
, slaughtering animals
for human needs is imperative for research
and food. A key point to notice is that these species are put into various research
for academic studies that will not only benefit future exploration but also
create different drugs for human treatment. Additionally
, they are also
used to manufacture products such
as vitamins and nutritional foods which are necessary for human living. For example
, according to
research
in India, many new viruses are being controlled due to
adding honey and cow dung for the treatment of patients and children.
Change preposition
by
To conclude
, even though it is necessary for local dwellers to provide basic rights for animals
, such
as banning deforestation, I believe that conducting research
and getting nutritional values cannot be obtained unless they are being consumed by people.Submitted by abdulahad08600 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
To enhance clarity and expressiveness, make sure to avoid repeating phrases and ideas. For example, instead of reiterating 'human needs' and 'research and food' multiple times, try paraphrasing or providing more nuanced explanations.
task achievement
Incorporate more varied and specific examples to bolster your argument. For instance, rather than just mentioning research in India, illustrate specific studies or instances where animal use has directly benefited human advancements in medicine.
introduction conclusion present
A strong introduction and conclusion frame the essay effectively, clearly setting out the debate and summarizing your opinion.
complete response
The essay covers both perspectives of the argument and provides a balanced view, demonstrating a good understanding of the task.