Some cities have few controls over design and construction on housing and office building. People think that they are free to choose the design they like. Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages?

Nowadays, architecture is considered an art sector. There are a lot of

property

Fix the agreement mistake

properties

show examples

with distinct shapes and levels.

Nevertheless

, a diverse range of areas has a district role in the design and construction of

buildings

. Individuals assume that they have the ability to opt for the shape that they prefer. I have a balanced opinion on

this

argument. In

this

essay, I will elaborate on the pros and cons. On the one hand, the design is some kind of an innovation. It discriminates between the creative designer and who is copying. One of the sparked paradigms was when an Egyptian designer copied the design of a Russian art in the Egyptian railway station. It was a major scandal and the Egyptian

government

eliminated her from any projects.

In addition

, it makes people delighted when they are visiting places

instead

of feeling tedious

due to

the same scenery. They can feel adrift if the

buildings

are the same.

For instance

, a diverse range of

buildings

in England is the same. Most tourists feel lost and tedious.

On the other hand

, control over designs can provide more roles and strictness. The

government

allow them to limit floors.

However

, they build more floors to gain more income without considering it hazards.

For instance

, In Egypt, the

government

allows only the building will be only four levels.

Nonetheless

, owners building more,

this

led to every building being charged more money to allow the facilities to apply on likely electricity and water. In conclusion, there will be a debate on

this

argument. The

government

should play a more critical role in these

buildings

. It

also

can allow flexibility and negotiate with designers in well-designed constructions.