Some people think history has little or nothing to offer, while others say the study of the past helps us understand the present. Discuss both viewpoints and give your opinion.
Nowadays, there are two prevailing views in society regarding the value of
history
. Some believe that history
is unreliable or irrelevant, while
others think that history
helps us understand the present. Although
some argue that there is little or nothing to learn from history
, I believe we should study it for the sake of our future
.In today's world, many people are skeptical
about the accuracy of historical accounts. Change the spelling
sceptical
For example
, historical records can be altered over time by humans. If you read about a historical event in one book, you might find a different version in another book. This
inconsistency leads some to question the reliability of the history
. However
, despite of
these concerns, it is crucial to preserve and protect historical records to ensure their accuracy and integrity for Change preposition
apply
future
generations.On the other hand
, many people believe that history
is essential for understanding the present and shaping the future
. For instance
, past generations made numerous mistakes
, and by studying these mistakes
, we can learn valuable lessons. History
teaches us how to find solutions to current problems and avoid repeating errors. For example
, many leaders in the past is
made Unnecessary verb
apply
mistakes
in governance. By analyzing these historical errors, we can prevent similar mistakes
in the future
and improve our leadership strategies.In conclusion, even if history
is sometimes questioned for its accuracy, we should study it for the benefit of our future
. History
is the only guide that helps us learn from past mistakes
and make informed decisions to build a better future
.Submitted by makemoneyizzy16 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
The essay addresses both viewpoints and provides a balanced discussion, which is a strong point. However, to improve the task response, provide more specific and detailed examples, rather than general statements. For instance, historical events can be cited to support your points about the unreliability of historical records and the value of learning from past mistakes.
coherence cohesion
To enhance coherence and cohesion, work on ensuring smoother transitions between ideas and paragraphs. For example, using linking words and phrases such as 'moreover,' 'furthermore,' or 'in addition' can improve the flow of the essay. Also, rephrase sentence structures to avoid repetition (e.g., 'For instance, past generations made numerous mistakes...' and 'many leaders in the past made mistakes...' can be varied to avoid redundancy).
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are well-presented, clearly stating the viewpoints and your position, which gives a strong framework to your essay.
task achievement
The essay effectively discusses both sides of the argument, which shows a balanced approach and holistic understanding of the topic.
Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
The easiest way to score well on the IELTS Task 2 writing portion is to structure your writing in a solid essay format.
A strong argument essay structure can be split up into 4 paragraphs, each containing 4 sentences (except the conclusion paragraph, which only contains 3 sentences).
Stick to this essay structure:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion