Governments should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens’ health rather than on protecting the environmemt. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In recent years, it has been observed that there has been a noticeable rise in the number of individuals comparing the significance of medical innovation and environmental preservation and their impacts on various aspects of our daily lives and surroundings. It is frequently contended that authorities should allocate more funds to healthcare
research
to safeguard public well-being, while
others assert that maintaining the environment should not be neglected. In this
essay, it will be argued that a balance between investing in scientific exploration and ecological protection is crucial for achieving both human health
and sustainability.
To begin
with, there is an argument to be made that enhanced funding for scientific research
should be prioritized substantially for several primary reasons, foremost being the immediate effect on human life and the potential for saving lives. For instance
, advancements in medical studies have led to the development of life-saving treatments and immunizations, particularly in response to global health
crises. For
this
reason, it is evident that considerable resources have been dedicated to healthcare research
, resulting in notable advancements in medical outcomes and the overall
well-being of citizens.
On the other hand
, there is a widespread belief that preserving the ecosystem is also
essential. Environmental degradation, if not addressed, can lead to long-term health
issues that may surpass the benefits of short-term clinical progress. This
perspective is supported by examples of regions affected by pollution and climate change, where the health
impacts are severe and extensive. Hence
, it is apparent that efforts have been made to protect the environment through the enforcement of regulations and the encouragement of sustainable practices, ultimately leading to healthier living conditions for the future.
In conclusion, while
the importance of investing funds into healthcare research
is evident, the significance of ecological preservation cannot be understated. A balanced approach that encompasses both scientific inquiry and environmental sustainability is essential for ensuring the long-term health
and prosperity of society.Submitted by tahsin.adam3 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
You have done well in addressing both sides of the argument. However, providing more specific examples or data could further enhance your task response.
task response
Try to more directly answer the question in both the introduction and conclusion by clearly stating your stance.
task response
While your ideas are generally clear, ensure that each paragraph has a topic sentence that clearly conveys the main point.
coherence cohesion
Organize your essay with clearer transitions between paragraphs. This will help maintain the flow and improve coherence.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that all points are explicitly linked back to the essay's main argument to enhance coherence.
coherence cohesion
Your essay has a clear introduction and conclusion which frame the arguments well.
task response
You have effectively argued for a balanced approach, which demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the issue.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?