Some people think that the goverment should strictly control the supply of fresh water, as it is a limited resource , while others it should not be regulated. Discuss both the sides and give your opinion

Several
people
believe that it will be better if authorities control the supply chain of natural
water
through strict laws.
Whereas
, others think that there is no need to regulate it. In
this
essay, I will discuss both of these opinions and give my own perspective. On the one hand, the reason why the government have
to begin
to apply hard rules for
water
usage is because
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
water
resources have been declining over the
last
century
due to
climate change happening in the world as a whole. Many places are suffering with their basic needs including
water
supplies. It can be seen in South Africa, where numerous citizens have killed caused of limited fresh
water
from rivers and dams. The level of
water
there has been dropping followed by increasing average temperature. It is evidence why the councils should regulate the usage of
water
in order to secure the lives of their inhabitants.
On the other hand
, It is not important to do it because
people
nowadays can recycle easily the waste of
water
. Sophisticated technology has helped to develop the utilities for
this
method and it changes dirty
water
or liquid-waste
water
into drinkable through several steps done by modern equipment. Germany,
for instance
,
they
Correct pronoun usage
apply
show examples
has
Change the verb form
have
show examples
implemented that method to change the poor condition of
water
from their citizens into
water
Add an article
the water
show examples
which can be drunk.
This
water
then
circulated to all of the
people
in
this
nation.
In addition
, for me, it is more valuable if the government can introduce and build recycling
water
facilities
instead
of making strict laws. In conclusion, the idea for making strict rules might be based on climate change where many
people
all over the world are suffering from
water
burdens.
However
, developing a recycling
water
plan is more urgent rather than just introducing laws. It is clear to me that I support the second idea.
Submitted by hikmanurdin04 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

relevant examples
Try to provide more specific examples and statistics to support your points. This can make your argument more convincing.
logical structure
Ensure you have a clear topic sentence for each paragraph that directly relates to the essay prompt.
logical structure
Improve the coherence between paragraphs by using clearer transition words and phrases.
clear ideas
Avoid minor grammatical and sentence structure errors. Proofreading your work before submission can help rectify these issues.
introduction
The introduction is effective and clearly presents the two sides of the argument.
conclusion
The conclusion ties the essay together and clearly states your opinion.
supported main points
The essay provides relevant points and examples which support the main arguments.
complete response
Overall response fulfills the task requirement, discussing both sides and stating your opinion.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • limited resource
  • strictly control
  • government regulation
  • manage
  • allocate
  • responsibly
  • sustainable
  • water scarcity
  • water conservation
  • equitable distribution
What to do next:
Look at other essays: