Some people think that the goverment should strictly control the supply of fresh water, as it is a limited resource , while others it should not be regulated. Discuss both the sides and give your opinion
Several
people
believe that it will be better if authorities control the supply chain of natural water
through strict laws. Whereas
, others think that there is no need to regulate it. In this
essay, I will discuss both of these opinions and give my own perspective.
On the one hand, the reason why the government have to begin
to apply hard rules for water
usage is because the
Correct article usage
apply
water
resources have been declining over the last
century due to
climate change happening in the world as a whole. Many places are suffering with their basic needs including water
supplies. It can be seen in South Africa, where numerous citizens have killed caused of limited fresh water
from rivers and dams. The level of water
there has been dropping followed by increasing average temperature. It is evidence why the councils should regulate the usage of water
in order to secure the lives of their inhabitants.
On the other hand
, It is not important to do it because people
nowadays can recycle easily the waste of water
. Sophisticated technology has helped to develop the utilities for this
method and it changes dirty water
or liquid-waste water
into drinkable through several steps done by modern equipment. Germany, for instance
, they
Correct pronoun usage
apply
has
implemented that method to change the poor condition of Change the verb form
have
water
from their citizens into water
which can be drunk. Add an article
the water
This
water
then
circulated to all of the people
in this
nation. In addition
, for me, it is more valuable if the government can introduce and build recycling water
facilities instead
of making strict laws.
In conclusion, the idea for making strict rules might be based on climate change where many people
all over the world are suffering from water
burdens. However
, developing a recycling water
plan is more urgent rather than just introducing laws. It is clear to me that I support the second idea.Submitted by hikmanurdin04 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
relevant examples
Try to provide more specific examples and statistics to support your points. This can make your argument more convincing.
logical structure
Ensure you have a clear topic sentence for each paragraph that directly relates to the essay prompt.
logical structure
Improve the coherence between paragraphs by using clearer transition words and phrases.
clear ideas
Avoid minor grammatical and sentence structure errors. Proofreading your work before submission can help rectify these issues.
introduction
The introduction is effective and clearly presents the two sides of the argument.
conclusion
The conclusion ties the essay together and clearly states your opinion.
supported main points
The essay provides relevant points and examples which support the main arguments.
complete response
Overall response fulfills the task requirement, discussing both sides and stating your opinion.