Some people think that newspaper are best media to learn and get information from, while others believe that internet is a better source.Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Nowadays there are large sources for accessing the
news
, so
this
will be an argument about which is more reliable between online and paper. I will describe the pros and cons of each one of them in my essay. On the one hand, newspaper companies have lots of professional officials to supervise the information which they give to the public,
therefore
it will be a more reliable source for getting accurate
data
.
For example
, in these types of companies, a team exists to research happenings, and they consider the truth of the information and access the accuracy of details.
However
, the quality of
this
information is better than that of other resources, but
also
it has huge costs for the government.
For instance
, the expenses of the individuals who are their workforce are overwhelming, and it definitely has effects on the environment by deforestation for paper produce and delivery process.
On the other hand
, at present
due to
the new technology,
data
is provided via social media and the internet. Accessibility to
this
news
is very comfortable and it will not cost a lot. People can read daily
news
just by turning on the television or scrolling their social media.
Additionally
, the speed of
this
way is much higher than in the traditional spreading of
news
,
data
are frequently up-to-date, and you will be aware of the events that are happening over the world immediately. It
also
has some disadvantages
such
as delivering fake
news
from unreliable sources because there are no roles for observation and supervision of them yet. In conclusion,
while
newspapers have fundamental ways of bringing the
news
to the public, other sources
such
as the Internet exist and they have become more popular among people. It will be good to consider some observation rules to spread
data
on social media.
Submitted by ostorr7213 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Your essay covers both viewpoints and provides a balanced discussion, which is good. However, it would be beneficial to delve deeper into your arguments and provide more detailed examples to strengthen your points.
coherence cohesion
While the logical structure of your essay is generally clear, the introduction could be more specific about what you will discuss, rather than simply stating there will be a discussion. Your topic sentences should also more clearly introduce the main idea of each paragraph.
coherence cohesion
Your conclusion summarizes the main points well, but it could also restate your opinion more emphatically to leave a strong final impression on the reader.
task achievement
You have successfully compared and contrasted both media forms, which demonstrates a clear understanding of the topic.
coherence cohesion
Your essay structure—introduction, body paragraphs discussing each viewpoint, and conclusion—is logical and easy to follow.
supported main points
You highlighted relevant issues related to costs and reliability, which adds depth to your argument.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • reliable sources
  • fact-checking
  • curated content
  • editorial process
  • delayed reporting
  • constraints
  • real-time updates
  • perspectives
  • information overload
  • editorial oversight
  • misinformation
  • critical evaluation
  • navigating
  • immediacy
  • breadth
What to do next:
Look at other essays: