Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

With the advancements in technology, it has been the increasingly common idea that the rise in the cost of petrol can be a good solution to minimize traffic congestion and pollution, particularly in big cities.

While

there are some sensible positive effects of

this

trend, l believe that the encouragement of using public transport can be a great way to tackle that issue effectively. These days, the increase in the price of petrol may be the sole solution

in

Change preposition

to

show examples

addressing traffic congestion and city pollution

due to

several reasons. First of all, as long as governmental activities are forced in the field of fuel resources in order to lower the purchase of it, car owners could be discouraged sufficiently, resulting in less usage of private

cars

.

As a consequence

, traffic flow can be easy and the level of pollution decreases greatly.

Therefore

, the price of car fuels should be high to address

this

issue

as a result

. With the improvement of the economy, ordinary people can afford to buy whatever they want,

cars

in particular

.

This

usually influences the flow of

cars

on roads and harms the cities.

This

can be confronted by discouraging people from using private

cars

by imposing taxes for using and raising the cost of

cars

.

This

may cause owners to use it less, which means public transport may be the sole option

as a result

for people.

This

measure can be an ideal strategy to fight against congestion on roads and pollutants in metropolitan areas. In conclusion,

while

expensive petrol highly likely solves problems in an urban environment, l believe that discouragement by using different methods,

such

as taxes and luxury

cars

yields better solutions for city life.