Some people think government should tax unhealthy food to encourage people to begin to eat more healthy foods. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Food
is an essential part of every person. Use synonyms
Furthermore
, healthy ingredients keep a person fit and sick-free. Eating a lot of unhealthy types of Linking Words
food
can lead to the deterioration of their well-being. Nowadays, encouraging people Use synonyms
to begin
to eat more healthy Linking Words
foods
become a question. I generally agree that the government should Use synonyms
tax
unhealthy Use synonyms
food
Use synonyms
for
Linking Words
this
reason. As, the primary objective of the government is to keep their citizens healthy and disease-free, a Linking Words
tax
on them could help them in attaining it. We will elaborate on more reasons in the passage Use synonyms
further
.
First and foremost, taxing unhealthy Linking Words
food
can discourage people from buying and consuming it. When unhealthy options like fast Use synonyms
food
, sugary snacks, and drinks become more expensive Use synonyms
due to
taxation, consumers may think twice before making Linking Words
such
purchases. Linking Words
For instance
, countries that have implemented a "sugar Linking Words
tax
," Use synonyms
such
as the United Kingdom, have seen a reduction in the consumption of sugary beverages. As people are financially motivated to choose healthier options, Linking Words
this
could lead to a general improvement in public Linking Words
health
, including a decrease in obesity rates and diet-related illnesses like diabetes and heart disease.
Another key reason for taxing unhealthy Use synonyms
foods
is the potential to generate revenue that can be used for public Use synonyms
health
initiatives. The money raised from these taxes could be allocated to programs that educate the public about healthy eating and fund subsidies for healthier Use synonyms
food
options, Use synonyms
such
as fruits and vegetables. By making healthy Linking Words
food
more affordable and accessible, the government can help lower-income families make better dietary choices.Use synonyms
As a result
, a Linking Words
tax
on unhealthy Use synonyms
foods
can serve a dual purpose: discouraging harmful consumption Use synonyms
while
supporting public Linking Words
health
initiatives.
In conclusion, I believe that taxing unhealthy Use synonyms
foods
is a beneficial policy that can lead to significant improvements in public Use synonyms
health
. By discouraging the consumption of junk Use synonyms
food
and generating funds for Use synonyms
health
programs, Use synonyms
this
measure can help reduce the prevalence of diet-related diseases and promote healthier eating habits. Linking Words
While
there may be concerns about the impact on low-income groups, these can be addressed through subsidies and targeted public Linking Words
health
efforts. Use synonyms
Therefore
, I strongly agree with the idea of taxing unhealthy Linking Words
foods
as a means of encouraging healthier livingUse synonyms
Submitted by bitimbayz on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Try to expand on the reasons presented in the body paragraphs. Provide more varied examples and evidence to strengthen your argument.
coherence cohesion
Ensure smooth transitions between paragraphs to enhance the logical flow. You might want to use linking words more effectively to clarify the progression from one idea to another.
task achievement
The essay presents a clear viewpoint on the issue, supporting the argument that taxing unhealthy food can contribute to improved public health.
coherence cohesion
The essay contains a well-structured introduction and conclusion, effectively framing the discussion and summarizing the main points.
task achievement
The use of specific examples, such as the mention of the 'sugar tax' in the UK, adds credibility and relevance to the argument.