All large companies should provide sports and community facilities to the local community. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from own knowledge or experience.

These days, there is a widespread argument on the issue of whether large

companies

should provide sports and community

facilities

to the local people.

While

some still hold to the conservative view, I strongly argue that it is expected from large

companies

to establish sports and community

facilities

for the local people. The reasons for

this

are as follows. First of all, it is vitally important that large

companies

attempt to compensate for the harm they have brought to the local populations’ lives.

Although

such

companies

as Ferray factory have generated higher employment opportunities for the local residents, their ecological damages and disruptive impacts on residents’ daily lives like air pollution, noise pollution and heavy traffic are undeniable. In order to alleviate applied drawbacks, building sports gyms, health clinics and schools could be compensating. It is,

therefore

, necessary for large

companies

to pay adequate attention to the locals' tranquillity. Yet, perhaps the strongest argument in favour of

this

issue is the tremendous merits that would return to benefit those

companies

. Of course, investing in

such

facilities

would impose an economic burden on large

companies

,

nonetheless

,

this

approach would increase convenience and enjoyment for their employees as well, resulting in efficiency growth at work.

For instance

, having provided

such

facilities

for locals by Google company resulted in a peaceful life

as well as

an increase in the workers' innovation and problem-solving skills.

Additionally

,

this

would be associated with skilled workforces in the future. So, rather than considering building

facilities

for the public redundant, fulfilling these methods is advisable in the long term. By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that dedicating funds to providing

facilities

for local people is justified.

Furthermore

, warning the chief executive of the consequences of both implementing and ignoring

this

policy would encourage them to invest for the locals’ benefit.