There is an ongoing debate regarding the cost of healthcare is escalating at an alarming rate which creating issues for ruling bodies managing their budgets. A group of
individuals
believes that private insurance is the greatest step to solve Use synonyms
this
problem. Linking Words
However
, others claim that the Linking Words
governments
should take care of the health of Use synonyms
individuals
by giving free treatments. Use synonyms
Therefore
, ahead of my opinion, both views will be discussed Linking Words
further
.
Examining the former opinion, the primary argument supporters would put forward is that private insurance offers choice and potentially higher-quality care for those who can afford it. Linking Words
For instance
, insured Linking Words
individuals
can easily get prompt access to surgery, Use synonyms
while
a person generally waits a long time for it. Linking Words
In addition
, countries cannot afford certain expenses, as the Linking Words
governments
have other responsibilities, Use synonyms
such
as national security and providing education. Linking Words
Therefore
, Linking Words
individuals
who can afford private insurance should do so at their own expense.
Use synonyms
On the contrary
, the Linking Words
governments
should provide free services to those with low incomes, as they do not have enough money for treatments or drugs. Use synonyms
For example
, a report from the World Health Organisation has shown that 50% of underprivileged patients receive proper medical treatments Linking Words
due to
the government funds. Linking Words
Hence
, the Linking Words
governments
not only save poor people's lives but Use synonyms
also
improve the nation's reputation.
In conclusion, it can be stated that every coin has two sides; simultaneously, those who can pay for health coverage should take responsibility for insuring their own lives. Linking Words
However
, a country's leaders should help needy persons for the betterment of citizens' well-being.Linking Words