Do you agree with gun possession in public to protect lives ?

There has been an increasing number of crimes breaking out in today’s society and some of them even lead to loss of life. Under the circumstances, some advocate for legalising

gun

possession

so as to protect themselves and their families.

However

, I strongly argue that the introduction of

this

law will aggregate the situation, as the level of crime will be far more violent, resulting in the

police

not being able to ensure the safety of public citizens.

To begin

,

gun

possession

in the public domain will significantly increase the average crime level. As it stands, the process of owning a private

gun

is rigorous in most countries,

as a result

, few incidents involve

gun

usage.

However

, if the government enforced the law, it can be easily anticipated that more and more criminals would threaten to murder people in order to attain their missions.

Hence

, the more prevalent

gun

possession

is, the more dire crimes will occur.

Additionally

, the ubiquity of

gun

possessions will bring a substantial challenge to the

police

. As a general rule, it is only the

police

that can own guns. In light of

this

, criminals are inclined to be intimated by the

police

’s actions as there is a chance of them being shot

while

committing a crime.

Nevertheless

, with criminals having their own guns, they can now equally combat the

police

, which induces losing the

police

’s power and authority.

Hence

, no authorities can guarantee the safety of the public. In conclusion, from my perspective, not only does

gun

possession

elevate the rate of crimes involving

gun

usage, but it will

also

deprive the

police

of their vital function.

Thus

, I believe that general citizens should not be allowed to have a

gun

for their own protection.